Moshe changes the message

Rashi is telling us that when Moshe spoke to Pharaoh, he modified the message. In the end Pharaoh himself would come running to Moshe. However, since it wasn’t respectful to the king to mention that he would come running, Moshe changed the wording to, “Your servants will come running,” — out of respect for the monarchy.

Why should Moshe treat such a king with respect? Pharaoh was an enemy of HASHEM and of the Jewish people. He wasn’t deserving of respect.

This concept becomes difficult to understand when we take into account what his government stood for and who he was as an individual.

A wicked government

It would be difficult to imagine a government more evil than Pharaoh’s. Official policy was enslavement and oppression of the Jews -- not as a tolerated social ill, but as public policy and mandate of the government.

State law denied Jews all rights - owning property, free speech, public assembly – all this was the furthest thing from the mind of the Jewish people. They were treated as chattel, owned by the Mitzrim. Any Egyptian could at any time demand that a Jew work for him without pay.

Infanticide becomes state policy

Jews didn’t even have the right to live. As the Jewish People continued to thrive, infanticide became state policy. Pharaoh issued four separate decrees to stem the “Jewish population problem,” eventually commanding the citizens of Mitzraim to kill the Jewish newborns.

Bathing in babies’ blood

But even more telling, Pharaoh himself was a butcher. When he contracted Tzaras, his wise men offered the cure -- bathe in human blood. The Medrash tells us that to do this; he would bathe in the blood of Jewish babies each day. However, he needed a bath in the evening as well, and heaven forefend to use stale blood, so each morning and evening he would have 150 innocent Jewish souls slaughtered – for his personal comfort. 

Why should Moshe treat such a king with respect?

Respect for the institution not the individual

It seems that the answer to this question is the distinction between respecting the institution and respecting the individual.

For the proper running of society, and therefore for the good of mankind, there needs to be a system of leadership and a hierarchy of authority - what we know as government. For government to be effective, it must wield power and its citizens must respect its authority.

Without fear of government, a man will swallow his friend alive (Pirkei Avos). Anyone who has lived through a period of lawlessness can attest to the primal fear he felt as he helplessly watched rioting, looting, and mob behavior.  

Ask a recent émigré from South Africa what it is like when a group of thugs appears at his backyard picnic and begins indiscriminately shooting up his family. It’s a country where carjackings, muggings and armed holdups are the norm - and there is no one to talk to - not because people there are different, but because the respect for authority has melted.

 

One of the obligations on any member of a society is to obey and respect its leaders. It is a correct and proper manner of behavior. Without it, society itself cannot function.

 

As the king occupies the position of leadership of the country, it is the obligation of all to respect him. That is basic to the good of society. It is the right way to act, and it is the way that HASHEM wants us to act. This respect has nothing to do with the individual – it has to do with the position.

 

I may recognize that a leader, as an individual is a lout, but as long as he maintains his position, I am obligated to respect him.

Moshe Rabbenu acted with respect for the institution

Moshe Rabbenu was acting in the way that was right and proper. Despite the fact that this individual was wicked, he held the position of king, and therefore, Moshe acted with respect for the institution of leadership. Even though that institution was now being used to pursue wicked ends, the institution itself was still worthy of respect, and therefore Moshe acted that way.

Historically the role of King

This message is especially relevant in our times. Historically, kings viewed their populations as sources of taxes and foot soldiers - vehicles by which to expand their fame and fortune. Rare was the king who actually ruled for the good of his people.

 

We find ourselves in very different conditions - a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Whether we agree with every [MH1] policy or not, it is an unprecedented advance for the good of man - a regime run for the good of citizens of that land.

To us as Jews

To us as Jews, this should especially hit home. For almost 2,000 years, we have wandered from county to country, oppression to oppression, expulsion to expulsion. We now find ourselves welcome members of the American society: citizens with all the rights of any other citizen. We are allowed to operate our own schools in the manner that we see fit. We are allowed to worship in the way that we feel appropriate. We are allowed to conduct our lives in the way that we so choose. The only request made upon us is to abide by the laws of the land.

 

We have never had it this good. And therefore, it is incumbent upon us to respect this land, obey its laws, pay homage to its leaders, and appreciate the great blessing that we enjoy living in this country.

 

For more on this topic please listen to Shmuz #27 –America the Beautiful